CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

PFC 150×90×24 vs MC 6X16.3

PFC 150×90×24 is an PFC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); MC 6X16.3 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. PFC 150×90×24 carries more bending: 179 cm³ of plastic modulus against 170.43 cm³, 5.0% more. They weigh essentially the same, 23.9 kg/m and 24.3 kg/m. Both are about 151 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyPFC 150×90×24
PFC
MC 6X16.3
MC
Difference
Mass23.9 kg/m24.3 kg/m-1.6%
Depth150 mm152.4 mm-1.6%
Width90 mm76.2 mm+18.1%
Web thickness6.5 mm9.5 mm-31.6%
Flange thickness12 mm12.1 mm-0.8%
Area30.4 cm²30.9 cm²-1.6%
Second moment, major (Iy)1,160 cm⁴1,082 cm⁴+7.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)179 cm³170.43 cm³+5.0%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)155 cm³141.91 cm³+9.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)253 cm⁴156.9 cm⁴+61.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)76.9 cm³56.863 cm³+35.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.89 cm2.25 cm+28.4%
Torsion constant (It)11.8 cm⁴13.99 cm⁴-15.7%

PFC 150×90×24 to BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005; MC 6X16.3 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to MC 6X16.3.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, PFC 150×90×24 has the larger second moment of area: 1,160 cm⁴ against 1,082 cm⁴, a difference of 7.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, PFC 150×90×24 is the more efficient section: 7.5 against 7.0 cm³ per kg/m, 6.8% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: PFC 150×90×24 has 76.9 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 56.863 cm³, 35.2% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. PFC sections are specified to BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005 and MC to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, PFC 150×90×24 is the stronger section and PFC 150×90×24 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

PFC 150×90×24 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 179 cm³ against 170.43 cm³ - 5.0% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: PFC 150×90×24 is 23.9 kg/m and MC 6X16.3 is 24.3 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: MC 6X16.3 gives 170.43 cm³ of plastic modulus and 1,082 cm⁴ of inertia against 179 cm³ and 1,160 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

PFC 150×90×24, with a second moment of area of 1,160 cm⁴ against 1,082 cm⁴ (7.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

PFC 150×90×24 vs PFC 150×90
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…