CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

PFC 180×75×20 vs PFC 180×75

PFC 180×75×20 is a PFC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); PFC 180×75 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 176 cm³ against 176 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 20.3 kg/m and 20.3 kg/m. Both are about 180 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyPFC 180×75×20
PFC
PFC 180×75
PFC
Difference
Mass20.3 kg/m20.3 kg/msame
Depth180 mm180 mmsame
Width75 mm75 mmsame
Web thickness6 mm6 mmsame
Flange thickness10.5 mm10.5 mmsame
Area25.9 cm²25.9 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)1,370 cm⁴1,370 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)176 cm³176 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)152 cm³152 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)146 cm⁴146 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)51.8 cm³51.8 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.38 cm2.38 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)7.34 cm⁴7.34 cm⁴same

PFC 180×75×20 to BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005; PFC 180×75 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to PFC 180×75.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, PFC 180×75 has the larger second moment of area: 1,370 cm⁴ against 1,370 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (8.7 against 8.7 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. PFC sections are specified to BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005 and PFC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. PFC 180×75×20 has a plastic modulus of 176 cm³ and PFC 180×75 has 176 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: PFC 180×75×20 is 20.3 kg/m and PFC 180×75 is 20.3 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: PFC 180×75 gives 176 cm³ of plastic modulus and 1,370 cm⁴ of inertia against 176 cm³ and 1,370 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

PFC 180×75, with a second moment of area of 1,370 cm⁴ against 1,370 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…