CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

PFC 380×100×54 vs PFC 380×100

PFC 380×100×54 is a PFC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); PFC 380×100 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 933 cm³ against 933 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 54 kg/m and 54 kg/m. Both are about 380 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyPFC 380×100×54
PFC
PFC 380×100
PFC
Difference
Mass54 kg/m54 kg/msame
Depth380 mm380 mmsame
Width100 mm100 mmsame
Web thickness9.5 mm9.5 mmsame
Flange thickness17.5 mm17.5 mmsame
Area68.7 cm²68.7 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)15,000 cm⁴15,030 cm⁴-0.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)933 cm³933 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)791 cm³791 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)643 cm⁴643 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)161 cm³161 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.06 cm3.06 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)45.7 cm⁴45.7 cm⁴same

PFC 380×100×54 to BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005; PFC 380×100 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to PFC 380×100.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, PFC 380×100 has the larger second moment of area: 15,030 cm⁴ against 15,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (17.3 against 17.3 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. PFC sections are specified to BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005 and PFC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. PFC 380×100×54 has a plastic modulus of 933 cm³ and PFC 380×100 has 933 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: PFC 380×100×54 is 54 kg/m and PFC 380×100 is 54 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: PFC 380×100 gives 933 cm³ of plastic modulus and 15,030 cm⁴ of inertia against 933 cm³ and 15,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 1993-1-1:2005 / BS 4-1:2005 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

PFC 380×100, with a second moment of area of 15,030 cm⁴ against 15,000 cm⁴ (0.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

PFC 380×100×54 vs C 15X40C 15X40 vs PFC 380×100
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…