RHS 120×60×12.5 vs RHS 120×80×10
RHS 120×60×12.5 is an RHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); RHS 120×80×10 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. RHS 120×80×10 carries more bending: 131 cm³ of plastic modulus against 126 cm³, 3.8% more. RHS 120×80×10 is the lighter of the two at 27.9 kg/m against 29.1 kg/m, a saving of 4.3% on steel weight. Both are about 120 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.
| Property | RHS 120×60×12.5 RHS Hot-finished | RHS 120×80×10 RHS | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mass | 29.1 kg/m | 27.9 kg/m | +4.3% |
| Depth | 120 mm | 120 mm | same |
| Width | 60 mm | 80 mm | -25.0% |
| Web thickness | 0 mm | 0 mm | same |
| Flange thickness | 0 mm | 0 mm | same |
| Area | 37.1 cm² | 34.9 cm² | +6.3% |
| Second moment, major (Iy) | 546 cm⁴ | 609 cm⁴ | -10.3% |
| Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y) | 126 cm³ | 131 cm³ | -3.8% |
| Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y) | 91.1 cm³ | 102 cm³ | -10.7% |
| Second moment, minor (Iz) | 165 cm⁴ | 313 cm⁴ | -47.3% |
| Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z) | 73.1 cm³ | 97.3 cm³ | -24.9% |
| Radius of gyration, minor (iz) | 2.11 cm | 2.99 cm | -29.4% |
| Torsion constant (It) | 442 cm⁴ | 688 cm⁴ | -35.8% |
RHS 120×60×12.5 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; RHS 120×80×10 to EN 10219 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to RHS 120×80×10.
How to choose between them
On stiffness, RHS 120×80×10 has the larger second moment of area: 609 cm⁴ against 546 cm⁴, a difference of 10.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.
Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, RHS 120×80×10 is the more efficient section: 4.7 against 4.3 cm³ per kg/m, 7.8% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.
The two diverge much more about the minor axis: RHS 120×80×10 has 97.3 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 73.1 cm³, 24.9% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.
These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. RHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and RHS to EN 10219 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 4.3% weight.
In short, RHS 120×80×10 is the stronger section and RHS 120×80×10 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.