CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

RHS 80×40×5 vs RHS 75×50×5

RHS 80×40×5 is an RHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); RHS 75×50×5 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 26.1 cm³ against 25.7 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.6%. They weigh essentially the same, 8.42 kg/m and 8.53 kg/m. RHS 80×40×5 is deeper, 80 mm against 75 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyRHS 80×40×5
RHS Hot-finished
RHS 75×50×5
RHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass8.4 kg/m8.5 kg/m-1.3%
Depth80 mm75 mm+6.7%
Width40 mm50 mm-20.0%
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area10.7 cm²10.9 cm²-1.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)80.3 cm⁴75.6 cm⁴+6.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)26.1 cm³25.7 cm³+1.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)20.1 cm³20.2 cm³-0.5%
Second moment, minor (Iz)25.7 cm⁴39.7 cm⁴-35.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)15.7 cm³19.3 cm³-18.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)1.55 cm1.91 cm-18.8%
Torsion constant (It)65.1 cm⁴89.5 cm⁴-27.3%

RHS 80×40×5 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; RHS 75×50×5 to EN 10219 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to RHS 75×50×5.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, RHS 80×40×5 has the larger second moment of area: 80.3 cm⁴ against 75.6 cm⁴, a difference of 6.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, RHS 80×40×5 is the more efficient section: 3.1 against 3.0 cm³ per kg/m, 2.9% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: RHS 75×50×5 has 19.3 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 15.7 cm³, 18.7% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. RHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and RHS Cold-formed to EN 10219 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. RHS 80×40×5 has a plastic modulus of 26.1 cm³ and RHS 75×50×5 has 25.7 cm³, a difference of only 1.6% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: RHS 80×40×5 is 8.42 kg/m and RHS 75×50×5 is 8.53 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: RHS 75×50×5 gives 25.7 cm³ of plastic modulus and 75.6 cm⁴ of inertia against 26.1 cm³ and 80.3 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10210-2:2006 and EN 10219 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

RHS 80×40×5, with a second moment of area of 80.3 cm⁴ against 75.6 cm⁴ (6.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

RHS 80×40×5 vs CF RHS 80×60×4
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…