CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 100×100×6.3 vs SHS 100×100×6.4

SHS 100×100×6.3 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); SHS 100×100×6.4 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. SHS 100×100×6.3 carries more bending: 80.9 cm³ of plastic modulus against 77.3 cm³, 4.7% more. They weigh essentially the same, 18.2 kg/m and 18.2 kg/m. Both are about 100 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 100×100×6.3
SHS Hot-finished
SHS 100×100×6.4
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass18.2 kg/m18.2 kg/msame
Depth100 mm100 mmsame
Width100 mm100 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area23.2 cm²22.6 cm²+2.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)336 cm⁴318 cm⁴+5.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)80.9 cm³77.3 cm³+4.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)67.1 cm³63.5 cm³+5.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)336 cm⁴318 cm⁴+5.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)80.9 cm³77.3 cm³+4.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.8 cm3.75 cm+1.3%
Torsion constant (It)534 cm⁴543 cm⁴-1.7%

SHS 100×100×6.3 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; SHS 100×100×6.4 to EN 10219 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to SHS 100×100×6.4.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 100×100×6.3 has the larger second moment of area: 336 cm⁴ against 318 cm⁴, a difference of 5.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, SHS 100×100×6.3 is the more efficient section: 4.4 against 4.2 cm³ per kg/m, 4.7% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. SHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and SHS Cold-formed to EN 10219 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, SHS 100×100×6.3 is the stronger section and SHS 100×100×6.4 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

SHS 100×100×6.3 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 80.9 cm³ against 77.3 cm³ - 4.7% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: SHS 100×100×6.3 is 18.2 kg/m and SHS 100×100×6.4 is 18.2 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: SHS 100×100×6.4 gives 77.3 cm³ of plastic modulus and 318 cm⁴ of inertia against 80.9 cm³ and 336 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10210-2:2006 and EN 10219 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

SHS 100×100×6.3, with a second moment of area of 336 cm⁴ against 318 cm⁴ (5.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…