CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 120×120×4 vs CF SHS 120×120×4

SHS 120×120×4 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 120×120×4 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 79.7 cm³ against 78.3 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.8%. They weigh essentially the same, 14.4 kg/m and 14.2 kg/m. Both are about 120 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 120×120×4
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 120×120×4
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass14.4 kg/m14.2 kg/m+1.4%
Depth120 mm120 mmsame
Width120 mm120 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area18.4 cm²18.1 cm²+1.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)410 cm⁴402 cm⁴+2.0%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)79.7 cm³78.3 cm³+1.8%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)68.4 cm³67 cm³+2.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)410 cm⁴402 cm⁴+2.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)79.7 cm³78.3 cm³+1.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.72 cm4.71 cm+0.2%
Torsion constant (It)635 cm⁴637 cm⁴-0.3%

SHS 120×120×4 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 120×120×4 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 120×120×4.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 120×120×4 has the larger second moment of area: 410 cm⁴ against 402 cm⁴, a difference of 2.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (5.5 against 5.5 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. SHS 120×120×4 has a plastic modulus of 79.7 cm³ and CF SHS 120×120×4 has 78.3 cm³, a difference of only 1.8% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: SHS 120×120×4 is 14.4 kg/m and CF SHS 120×120×4 is 14.2 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 120×120×4 gives 78.3 cm³ of plastic modulus and 402 cm⁴ of inertia against 79.7 cm³ and 410 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

SHS 120×120×4, with a second moment of area of 410 cm⁴ against 402 cm⁴ (2.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…