CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 120×120×8 vs CF SHS 120×120×8

SHS 120×120×8 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 120×120×8 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). SHS 120×120×8 carries more bending: 146 cm³ of plastic modulus against 138 cm³, 5.8% more. CF SHS 120×120×8 is the lighter of the two at 26.4 kg/m against 27.6 kg/m, a saving of 4.5% on steel weight. Both are about 120 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 120×120×8
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 120×120×8
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass27.6 kg/m26.4 kg/m+4.5%
Depth120 mm120 mmsame
Width120 mm120 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area35.2 cm²33.6 cm²+4.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)726 cm⁴677 cm⁴+7.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)146 cm³138 cm³+5.8%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)121 cm³113 cm³+7.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)726 cm⁴677 cm⁴+7.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)146 cm³138 cm³+5.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.55 cm4.49 cm+1.3%
Torsion constant (It)1,160 cm⁴1,160 cm⁴same

SHS 120×120×8 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 120×120×8 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 120×120×8.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 120×120×8 has the larger second moment of area: 726 cm⁴ against 677 cm⁴, a difference of 7.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (5.3 against 5.2 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, SHS 120×120×8 is the stronger section and CF SHS 120×120×8 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

SHS 120×120×8 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 146 cm³ against 138 cm³ - 5.8% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

CF SHS 120×120×8 at 26.4 kg/m, against 27.6 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.5%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 120×120×8 gives 138 cm³ of plastic modulus and 677 cm⁴ of inertia against 146 cm³ and 726 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

SHS 120×120×8, with a second moment of area of 726 cm⁴ against 677 cm⁴ (7.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

SHS 120×120×7.1 vs CF SHS 120×120×8SHS 120×120×7.1 vs SHS 120×120×8
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…