CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 120×120×8.8 vs CF SHS 120×120×10

SHS 120×120×8.8 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 120×120×10 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). CF SHS 120×120×10 carries more bending: 162 cm³ of plastic modulus against 158 cm³, 2.5% more. SHS 120×120×8.8 is the lighter of the two at 30.1 kg/m against 31.8 kg/m, a saving of 5.3% on steel weight. Both are about 120 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 120×120×8.8
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 120×120×10
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass30.1 kg/m31.8 kg/m-5.3%
Depth120 mm120 mmsame
Width120 mm120 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area38.3 cm²40.6 cm²-5.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)779 cm⁴777 cm⁴+0.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)158 cm³162 cm³-2.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)130 cm³129 cm³+0.8%
Second moment, minor (Iz)779 cm⁴777 cm⁴+0.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)158 cm³162 cm³-2.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.51 cm4.38 cm+3.0%
Torsion constant (It)1,250 cm⁴1,380 cm⁴-9.4%

SHS 120×120×8.8 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 120×120×10 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 120×120×10.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 120×120×8.8 has the larger second moment of area: 779 cm⁴ against 777 cm⁴, a difference of 0.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, SHS 120×120×8.8 is the more efficient section: 5.2 against 5.1 cm³ per kg/m, 3.0% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

In short, CF SHS 120×120×10 is the stronger section and SHS 120×120×8.8 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

CF SHS 120×120×10 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 162 cm³ against 158 cm³ - 2.5% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

SHS 120×120×8.8 at 30.1 kg/m, against 31.8 kg/m for the other - a saving of 5.3%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 120×120×10 gives 162 cm³ of plastic modulus and 777 cm⁴ of inertia against 158 cm³ and 779 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

SHS 120×120×8.8, with a second moment of area of 779 cm⁴ against 777 cm⁴ (0.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…