CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 140×140×8.8 vs CF SHS 140×140×10

SHS 140×140×8.8 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 140×140×10 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). CF SHS 140×140×10 carries more bending: 230 cm³ of plastic modulus against 221 cm³, 3.9% more. SHS 140×140×8.8 is the lighter of the two at 35.6 kg/m against 38.1 kg/m, a saving of 6.6% on steel weight. Both are about 140 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 140×140×8.8
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 140×140×10
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass35.6 kg/m38.1 kg/m-6.6%
Depth140 mm140 mmsame
Width140 mm140 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area45.4 cm²48.6 cm²-6.6%
Second moment, major (Iy)1,290 cm⁴1,310 cm⁴-1.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)221 cm³230 cm³-3.9%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)184 cm³187 cm³-1.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,290 cm⁴1,310 cm⁴-1.5%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)221 cm³230 cm³-3.9%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.33 cm5.2 cm+2.5%
Torsion constant (It)2,050 cm⁴2,270 cm⁴-9.7%

SHS 140×140×8.8 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 140×140×10 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 140×140×10.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, CF SHS 140×140×10 has the larger second moment of area: 1,310 cm⁴ against 1,290 cm⁴, a difference of 1.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, SHS 140×140×8.8 is the more efficient section: 6.2 against 6.0 cm³ per kg/m, 2.8% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

In short, CF SHS 140×140×10 is the stronger section and SHS 140×140×8.8 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

CF SHS 140×140×10 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 230 cm³ against 221 cm³ - 3.9% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

SHS 140×140×8.8 at 35.6 kg/m, against 38.1 kg/m for the other - a saving of 6.6%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 140×140×10 gives 230 cm³ of plastic modulus and 1,310 cm⁴ of inertia against 221 cm³ and 1,290 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

CF SHS 140×140×10, with a second moment of area of 1,310 cm⁴ against 1,290 cm⁴ (1.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…