CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 150×150×7.1 vs CF SHS 150×150×8

SHS 150×150×7.1 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 150×150×8 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). CF SHS 150×150×8 carries more bending: 226 cm³ of plastic modulus against 213 cm³, 5.8% more. SHS 150×150×7.1 is the lighter of the two at 31.4 kg/m against 33.9 kg/m, a saving of 7.4% on steel weight. Both are about 150 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 150×150×7.1
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 150×150×8
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass31.4 kg/m33.9 kg/m-7.4%
Depth150 mm150 mmsame
Width150 mm150 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area40 cm²43.2 cm²-7.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)1,350 cm⁴1,410 cm⁴-4.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)213 cm³226 cm³-5.8%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)180 cm³188 cm³-4.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,350 cm⁴1,410 cm⁴-4.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)213 cm³226 cm³-5.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.81 cm5.71 cm+1.8%
Torsion constant (It)2,120 cm⁴2,360 cm⁴-10.2%

SHS 150×150×7.1 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 150×150×8 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 150×150×8.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, CF SHS 150×150×8 has the larger second moment of area: 1,410 cm⁴ against 1,350 cm⁴, a difference of 4.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (6.8 against 6.7 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, CF SHS 150×150×8 is the stronger section and SHS 150×150×7.1 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

CF SHS 150×150×8 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 226 cm³ against 213 cm³ - 5.8% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

SHS 150×150×7.1 at 31.4 kg/m, against 33.9 kg/m for the other - a saving of 7.4%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 150×150×8 gives 226 cm³ of plastic modulus and 1,410 cm⁴ of inertia against 213 cm³ and 1,350 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

CF SHS 150×150×8, with a second moment of area of 1,410 cm⁴ against 1,350 cm⁴ (4.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

SHS 150×150×7.1 vs SHS 150×150×8SHS 150×150×8 vs CF SHS 150×150×8
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…