CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 180×180×5 vs CF SHS 180×180×5

SHS 180×180×5 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 180×180×5 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 227 cm³ against 224 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.3%. They weigh essentially the same, 27.3 kg/m and 27 kg/m. Both are about 180 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 180×180×5
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 180×180×5
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass27.3 kg/m27 kg/m+1.1%
Depth180 mm180 mmsame
Width180 mm180 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area34.7 cm²34.4 cm²+0.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)1,770 cm⁴1,740 cm⁴+1.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)227 cm³224 cm³+1.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)196 cm³193 cm³+1.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,770 cm⁴1,740 cm⁴+1.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)227 cm³224 cm³+1.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.13 cm7.11 cm+0.3%
Torsion constant (It)2,720 cm⁴2,720 cm⁴same

SHS 180×180×5 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 180×180×5 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 180×180×5.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 180×180×5 has the larger second moment of area: 1,770 cm⁴ against 1,740 cm⁴, a difference of 1.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (8.3 against 8.3 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. SHS 180×180×5 has a plastic modulus of 227 cm³ and CF SHS 180×180×5 has 224 cm³, a difference of only 1.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: SHS 180×180×5 is 27.3 kg/m and CF SHS 180×180×5 is 27 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 180×180×5 gives 224 cm³ of plastic modulus and 1,740 cm⁴ of inertia against 227 cm³ and 1,770 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

SHS 180×180×5, with a second moment of area of 1,770 cm⁴ against 1,740 cm⁴ (1.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…