CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 200×200×5 vs CF SHS 200×200×5

SHS 200×200×5 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 200×200×5 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 283 cm³ against 279 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.4%. They weigh essentially the same, 30.4 kg/m and 30.1 kg/m. Both are about 200 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 200×200×5
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 200×200×5
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass30.4 kg/m30.1 kg/m+1.0%
Depth200 mm200 mmsame
Width200 mm200 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area38.7 cm²38.4 cm²+0.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)2,450 cm⁴2,410 cm⁴+1.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)283 cm³279 cm³+1.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)245 cm³241 cm³+1.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,450 cm⁴2,410 cm⁴+1.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)283 cm³279 cm³+1.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.95 cm7.93 cm+0.3%
Torsion constant (It)3,760 cm⁴3,760 cm⁴same

SHS 200×200×5 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 200×200×5 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 200×200×5.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 200×200×5 has the larger second moment of area: 2,450 cm⁴ against 2,410 cm⁴, a difference of 1.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (9.3 against 9.3 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. SHS 200×200×5 has a plastic modulus of 283 cm³ and CF SHS 200×200×5 has 279 cm³, a difference of only 1.4% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: SHS 200×200×5 is 30.4 kg/m and CF SHS 200×200×5 is 30.1 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 200×200×5 gives 279 cm³ of plastic modulus and 2,410 cm⁴ of inertia against 283 cm³ and 2,450 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

SHS 200×200×5, with a second moment of area of 2,450 cm⁴ against 2,410 cm⁴ (1.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…