SHS 260×260×10 vs CF SHS 250×250×12
SHS 260×260×10 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 250×250×12 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). CF SHS 250×250×12 carries more bending: 944 cm³ of plastic modulus against 924 cm³, 2.1% more. SHS 260×260×10 is the lighter of the two at 77.7 kg/m against 84.8 kg/m, a saving of 8.4% on steel weight. SHS 260×260×10 is deeper, 260 mm against 250 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.
| Property | SHS 260×260×10 SHS Hot-finished | CF SHS 250×250×12 SHS Cold-formed | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mass | 77.7 kg/m | 84.8 kg/m | -8.4% |
| Depth | 260 mm | 250 mm | +4.0% |
| Width | 260 mm | 250 mm | +4.0% |
| Web thickness | 0 mm | 0 mm | same |
| Flange thickness | 0 mm | 0 mm | same |
| Area | 98.9 cm² | 108 cm² | -8.4% |
| Second moment, major (Iy) | 10,200 cm⁴ | 9,860 cm⁴ | +3.4% |
| Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y) | 924 cm³ | 944 cm³ | -2.1% |
| Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y) | 788 cm³ | 789 cm³ | -0.1% |
| Second moment, minor (Iz) | 10,200 cm⁴ | 9,860 cm⁴ | +3.4% |
| Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z) | 924 cm³ | 944 cm³ | -2.1% |
| Radius of gyration, minor (iz) | 10.2 cm | 9.55 cm | +6.8% |
| Torsion constant (It) | 15,900 cm⁴ | 16,700 cm⁴ | -4.8% |
SHS 260×260×10 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 250×250×12 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 250×250×12.
How to choose between them
On stiffness, SHS 260×260×10 has the larger second moment of area: 10,200 cm⁴ against 9,860 cm⁴, a difference of 3.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.
Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, SHS 260×260×10 is the more efficient section: 11.9 against 11.1 cm³ per kg/m, 6.8% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.
In short, CF SHS 250×250×12 is the stronger section and SHS 260×260×10 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.