CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 300×300×10 vs CF SHS 300×300×10

SHS 300×300×10 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 300×300×10 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). SHS 300×300×10 carries more bending: 1250 cm³ of plastic modulus against 1210 cm³, 3.3% more. CF SHS 300×300×10 is the lighter of the two at 88.4 kg/m against 90.2 kg/m, a saving of 2.0% on steel weight. Both are about 300 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 300×300×10
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 300×300×10
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass90.2 kg/m88.4 kg/m+2.0%
Depth300 mm300 mmsame
Width300 mm300 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area115 cm²113 cm²+1.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)16,000 cm⁴15,500 cm⁴+3.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,250 cm³1,210 cm³+3.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,070 cm³1,040 cm³+2.9%
Second moment, minor (Iz)16,000 cm⁴15,500 cm⁴+3.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,250 cm³1,210 cm³+3.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)11.8 cm11.7 cm+0.9%
Torsion constant (It)24,800 cm⁴25,000 cm⁴-0.8%

SHS 300×300×10 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 300×300×10 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 300×300×10.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 300×300×10 has the larger second moment of area: 16,000 cm⁴ against 15,500 cm⁴, a difference of 3.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (13.9 against 13.7 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, SHS 300×300×10 is the stronger section and CF SHS 300×300×10 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

SHS 300×300×10 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 1250 cm³ against 1210 cm³ - 3.3% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

CF SHS 300×300×10 at 88.4 kg/m, against 90.2 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.0%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 300×300×10 gives 1210 cm³ of plastic modulus and 15,500 cm⁴ of inertia against 1250 cm³ and 16,000 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

SHS 300×300×10, with a second moment of area of 16,000 cm⁴ against 15,500 cm⁴ (3.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…