CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 300×300×14.2 vs SHS 300×300×16

SHS 300×300×14.2 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); SHS 300×300×16 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. SHS 300×300×16 carries more bending: 1774 cm³ of plastic modulus against 1710 cm³, 3.6% more. SHS 300×300×14.2 is the lighter of the two at 126 kg/m against 138 kg/m, a saving of 8.7% on steel weight. Both are about 300 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 300×300×14.2
SHS Hot-finished
SHS 300×300×16
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass126 kg/m138 kg/m-8.7%
Depth300 mm300 mmsame
Width300 mm300 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area160 cm²171 cm²-6.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)21,600 cm⁴22,080 cm⁴-2.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,710 cm³1,774 cm³-3.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,440 cm³1,472 cm³-2.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)21,600 cm⁴22,080 cm⁴-2.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,710 cm³1,774 cm³-3.6%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)11.6 cm11.4 cm+1.8%
Torsion constant (It)33,900 cm⁴37,840 cm⁴-10.4%

SHS 300×300×14.2 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; SHS 300×300×16 to EN 10219 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to SHS 300×300×16.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 300×300×16 has the larger second moment of area: 22,080 cm⁴ against 21,600 cm⁴, a difference of 2.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, SHS 300×300×14.2 is the more efficient section: 13.6 against 12.9 cm³ per kg/m, 5.6% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. SHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and SHS Cold-formed to EN 10219 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 8.7% weight.

In short, SHS 300×300×16 is the stronger section and SHS 300×300×14.2 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

SHS 300×300×16 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 1774 cm³ against 1710 cm³ - 3.6% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

SHS 300×300×14.2 at 126 kg/m, against 138 kg/m for the other - a saving of 8.7%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: SHS 300×300×16 gives 1774 cm³ of plastic modulus and 22,080 cm⁴ of inertia against 1710 cm³ and 21,600 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10210-2:2006 and EN 10219 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

SHS 300×300×16, with a second moment of area of 22,080 cm⁴ against 21,600 cm⁴ (2.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…