CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 300×300×6.3 vs CF SHS 300×300×6.3

SHS 300×300×6.3 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 300×300×6.3 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 809 cm³ against 795 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.8%. They weigh essentially the same, 57.8 kg/m and 57 kg/m. Both are about 300 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 300×300×6.3
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 300×300×6.3
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass57.8 kg/m57 kg/m+1.4%
Depth300 mm300 mmsame
Width300 mm300 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area73.6 cm²72.6 cm²+1.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)10,500 cm⁴10,300 cm⁴+1.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)809 cm³795 cm³+1.8%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)703 cm³689 cm³+2.0%
Second moment, minor (Iz)10,500 cm⁴10,300 cm⁴+1.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)809 cm³795 cm³+1.8%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)12 cm11.9 cm+0.8%
Torsion constant (It)16,100 cm⁴16,200 cm⁴-0.6%

SHS 300×300×6.3 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 300×300×6.3 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 300×300×6.3.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 300×300×6.3 has the larger second moment of area: 10,500 cm⁴ against 10,300 cm⁴, a difference of 1.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (14.0 against 13.9 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. SHS 300×300×6.3 has a plastic modulus of 809 cm³ and CF SHS 300×300×6.3 has 795 cm³, a difference of only 1.8% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: SHS 300×300×6.3 is 57.8 kg/m and CF SHS 300×300×6.3 is 57 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 300×300×6.3 gives 795 cm³ of plastic modulus and 10,300 cm⁴ of inertia against 809 cm³ and 10,500 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

SHS 300×300×6.3, with a second moment of area of 10,500 cm⁴ against 10,300 cm⁴ (1.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

SHS 300×300×6.3 vs SHS 300×300×6
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…