CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 350×350×10 vs CF SHS 350×350×10

SHS 350×350×10 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 350×350×10 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). SHS 350×350×10 carries more bending: 1720 cm³ of plastic modulus against 1680 cm³, 2.4% more. They weigh essentially the same, 106 kg/m and 104 kg/m. Both are about 350 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 350×350×10
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 350×350×10
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass106 kg/m104 kg/m+1.9%
Depth350 mm350 mmsame
Width350 mm350 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area135 cm²133 cm²+1.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)25,900 cm⁴25,200 cm⁴+2.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,720 cm³1,680 cm³+2.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,480 cm³1,440 cm³+2.8%
Second moment, minor (Iz)25,900 cm⁴25,200 cm⁴+2.8%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,720 cm³1,680 cm³+2.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)13.9 cm13.8 cm+0.7%
Torsion constant (It)39,900 cm⁴40,100 cm⁴-0.5%

SHS 350×350×10 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 350×350×10 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 350×350×10.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 350×350×10 has the larger second moment of area: 25,900 cm⁴ against 25,200 cm⁴, a difference of 2.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (16.2 against 16.2 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, SHS 350×350×10 is the stronger section and CF SHS 350×350×10 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

SHS 350×350×10 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 1720 cm³ against 1680 cm³ - 2.4% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: SHS 350×350×10 is 106 kg/m and CF SHS 350×350×10 is 104 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 350×350×10 gives 1680 cm³ of plastic modulus and 25,200 cm⁴ of inertia against 1720 cm³ and 25,900 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

SHS 350×350×10, with a second moment of area of 25,900 cm⁴ against 25,200 cm⁴ (2.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…