CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 350×350×14.2 vs SHS 350×350×16

SHS 350×350×14.2 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); SHS 350×350×16 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. SHS 350×350×16 carries more bending: 2488 cm³ of plastic modulus against 2360 cm³, 5.1% more. SHS 350×350×14.2 is the lighter of the two at 148 kg/m against 163 kg/m, a saving of 9.2% on steel weight. Both are about 350 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 350×350×14.2
SHS Hot-finished
SHS 350×350×16
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass148 kg/m163 kg/m-9.2%
Depth350 mm350 mmsame
Width350 mm350 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area189 cm²203 cm²-6.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)35,200 cm⁴36,510 cm⁴-3.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,360 cm³2,488 cm³-5.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,010 cm³2,086 cm³-3.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)35,200 cm⁴36,510 cm⁴-3.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)2,360 cm³2,488 cm³-5.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)13.7 cm13.4 cm+2.2%
Torsion constant (It)54,900 cm⁴61,480 cm⁴-10.7%

SHS 350×350×14.2 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; SHS 350×350×16 to EN 10219 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to SHS 350×350×16.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 350×350×16 has the larger second moment of area: 36,510 cm⁴ against 35,200 cm⁴, a difference of 3.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, SHS 350×350×14.2 is the more efficient section: 15.9 against 15.3 cm³ per kg/m, 4.5% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. SHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and SHS Cold-formed to EN 10219 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 9.2% weight.

In short, SHS 350×350×16 is the stronger section and SHS 350×350×14.2 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

SHS 350×350×16 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 2488 cm³ against 2360 cm³ - 5.1% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

SHS 350×350×14.2 at 148 kg/m, against 163 kg/m for the other - a saving of 9.2%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: SHS 350×350×16 gives 2488 cm³ of plastic modulus and 36,510 cm⁴ of inertia against 2360 cm³ and 35,200 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10210-2:2006 and EN 10219 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

SHS 350×350×16, with a second moment of area of 36,510 cm⁴ against 35,200 cm⁴ (3.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…