CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 350×350×8 vs CF SHS 350×350×8

SHS 350×350×8 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 350×350×8 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1390 cm³ against 1370 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.5%. They weigh essentially the same, 85.4 kg/m and 84.2 kg/m. Both are about 350 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 350×350×8
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 350×350×8
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass85.4 kg/m84.2 kg/m+1.4%
Depth350 mm350 mmsame
Width350 mm350 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area109 cm²107 cm²+1.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)21,100 cm⁴20,700 cm⁴+1.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,390 cm³1,370 cm³+1.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,210 cm³1,180 cm³+2.5%
Second moment, minor (Iz)21,100 cm⁴20,700 cm⁴+1.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,390 cm³1,370 cm³+1.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)13.9 cm13.9 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)32,400 cm⁴32,600 cm⁴-0.6%

SHS 350×350×8 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 350×350×8 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 350×350×8.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 350×350×8 has the larger second moment of area: 21,100 cm⁴ against 20,700 cm⁴, a difference of 1.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (16.3 against 16.3 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. SHS 350×350×8 has a plastic modulus of 1390 cm³ and CF SHS 350×350×8 has 1370 cm³, a difference of only 1.5% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: SHS 350×350×8 is 85.4 kg/m and CF SHS 350×350×8 is 84.2 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 350×350×8 gives 1370 cm³ of plastic modulus and 20,700 cm⁴ of inertia against 1390 cm³ and 21,100 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

SHS 350×350×8, with a second moment of area of 21,100 cm⁴ against 20,700 cm⁴ (1.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…