CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 350×350×8.8 vs SHS 350×350×9

SHS 350×350×8.8 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); SHS 350×350×9 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1520 cm³ against 1522 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 93.6 kg/m and 94.7 kg/m. Both are about 350 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 350×350×8.8
SHS Hot-finished
SHS 350×350×9
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass93.6 kg/m94.7 kg/m-1.2%
Depth350 mm350 mmsame
Width350 mm350 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area119 cm²120 cm²-0.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)23,100 cm⁴22,970 cm⁴+0.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,520 cm³1,522 cm³-0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,320 cm³1,312 cm³+0.6%
Second moment, minor (Iz)23,100 cm⁴22,970 cm⁴+0.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,520 cm³1,522 cm³-0.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)13.9 cm13.8 cm+0.7%
Torsion constant (It)35,400 cm⁴36,370 cm⁴-2.7%

SHS 350×350×8.8 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; SHS 350×350×9 to EN 10219 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to SHS 350×350×9.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 350×350×8.8 has the larger second moment of area: 23,100 cm⁴ against 22,970 cm⁴, a difference of 0.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (16.2 against 16.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. SHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and SHS Cold-formed to EN 10219 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. SHS 350×350×8.8 has a plastic modulus of 1520 cm³ and SHS 350×350×9 has 1522 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: SHS 350×350×8.8 is 93.6 kg/m and SHS 350×350×9 is 94.7 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: SHS 350×350×9 gives 1522 cm³ of plastic modulus and 22,970 cm⁴ of inertia against 1520 cm³ and 23,100 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10210-2:2006 and EN 10219 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

SHS 350×350×8.8, with a second moment of area of 23,100 cm⁴ against 22,970 cm⁴ (0.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…