CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 400×400×12.5 vs CF SHS 400×400×12.5

SHS 400×400×12.5 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 400×400×12.5 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). SHS 400×400×12.5 carries more bending: 2780 cm³ of plastic modulus against 2680 cm³, 3.7% more. CF SHS 400×400×12.5 is the lighter of the two at 147 kg/m against 151 kg/m, a saving of 2.7% on steel weight. Both are about 400 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 400×400×12.5
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 400×400×12.5
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass151 kg/m147 kg/m+2.7%
Depth400 mm400 mmsame
Width400 mm400 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area192 cm²187 cm²+2.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)47,800 cm⁴45,900 cm⁴+4.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,780 cm³2,680 cm³+3.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,390 cm³2,290 cm³+4.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)47,800 cm⁴45,900 cm⁴+4.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)2,780 cm³2,680 cm³+3.7%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)15.8 cm15.7 cm+0.6%
Torsion constant (It)73,900 cm⁴74,600 cm⁴-0.9%

SHS 400×400×12.5 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 400×400×12.5 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 400×400×12.5.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 400×400×12.5 has the larger second moment of area: 47,800 cm⁴ against 45,900 cm⁴, a difference of 4.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (18.4 against 18.2 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, SHS 400×400×12.5 is the stronger section and CF SHS 400×400×12.5 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

SHS 400×400×12.5 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 2780 cm³ against 2680 cm³ - 3.7% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

CF SHS 400×400×12.5 at 147 kg/m, against 151 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.7%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 400×400×12.5 gives 2680 cm³ of plastic modulus and 45,900 cm⁴ of inertia against 2780 cm³ and 47,800 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

SHS 400×400×12.5, with a second moment of area of 47,800 cm⁴ against 45,900 cm⁴ (4.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…