CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 70×70×3.6 vs CF SHS 70×70×3.5

SHS 70×70×3.6 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 70×70×3.5 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). SHS 70×70×3.6 carries more bending: 23.3 cm³ of plastic modulus against 22.2 cm³, 5.0% more. CF SHS 70×70×3.5 is the lighter of the two at 7.06 kg/m against 7.4 kg/m, a saving of 4.8% on steel weight. Both are about 70 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 70×70×3.6
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 70×70×3.5
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass7.4 kg/m7.1 kg/m+4.8%
Depth70 mm70 mmsame
Width70 mm70 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area9.4 cm²9 cm²+4.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)68.6 cm⁴65.1 cm⁴+5.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)23.3 cm³22.2 cm³+5.0%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)19.6 cm³18.6 cm³+5.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)68.6 cm⁴65.1 cm⁴+5.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)23.3 cm³22.2 cm³+5.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.7 cm2.69 cm+0.4%
Torsion constant (It)108 cm⁴106 cm⁴+1.9%

SHS 70×70×3.6 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 70×70×3.5 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 70×70×3.5.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 70×70×3.6 has the larger second moment of area: 68.6 cm⁴ against 65.1 cm⁴, a difference of 5.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (3.1 against 3.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, SHS 70×70×3.6 is the stronger section and CF SHS 70×70×3.5 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

SHS 70×70×3.6 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 23.3 cm³ against 22.2 cm³ - 5.0% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

CF SHS 70×70×3.5 at 7.06 kg/m, against 7.4 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.8%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 70×70×3.5 gives 22.2 cm³ of plastic modulus and 65.1 cm⁴ of inertia against 23.3 cm³ and 68.6 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

SHS 70×70×3.6, with a second moment of area of 68.6 cm⁴ against 65.1 cm⁴ (5.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

SHS 70×70×3.2 vs CF SHS 70×70×3.5
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…