CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 70×70×7.1 vs SHS 75×75×6.4

SHS 70×70×7.1 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); SHS 75×75×6.4 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 40.3 cm³ against 40.1 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.5%. SHS 75×75×6.4 is the lighter of the two at 13.1 kg/m against 13.6 kg/m, a saving of 3.8% on steel weight. SHS 75×75×6.4 is deeper, 75 mm against 70 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 70×70×7.1
SHS Hot-finished
SHS 75×75×6.4
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass13.6 kg/m13.1 kg/m+3.8%
Depth70 mm75 mm-6.7%
Width70 mm75 mm-6.7%
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area17.3 cm²16.2 cm²+6.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)112 cm⁴120 cm⁴-6.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)40.3 cm³40.1 cm³+0.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)32 cm³32 cm³same
Second moment, minor (Iz)112 cm⁴120 cm⁴-6.7%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)40.3 cm³40.1 cm³+0.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.54 cm2.73 cm-7.0%
Torsion constant (It)185 cm⁴214 cm⁴-13.6%

SHS 70×70×7.1 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; SHS 75×75×6.4 to EN 10219 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to SHS 75×75×6.4.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 75×75×6.4 has the larger second moment of area: 120 cm⁴ against 112 cm⁴, a difference of 6.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, SHS 75×75×6.4 is the more efficient section: 3.1 against 3.0 cm³ per kg/m, 3.2% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. SHS Hot-finished sections are specified to BS EN 10210-2:2006 and SHS Cold-formed to EN 10219 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 3.8% weight.

In short, SHS 70×70×7.1 is the stronger section and SHS 75×75×6.4 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. SHS 70×70×7.1 has a plastic modulus of 40.3 cm³ and SHS 75×75×6.4 has 40.1 cm³, a difference of only 0.5% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

SHS 75×75×6.4 at 13.1 kg/m, against 13.6 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.8%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: SHS 75×75×6.4 gives 40.1 cm³ of plastic modulus and 120 cm⁴ of inertia against 40.3 cm³ and 112 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10210-2:2006 and EN 10219 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

SHS 75×75×6.4, with a second moment of area of 120 cm⁴ against 112 cm⁴ (6.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…