CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 80×80×3 vs CF SHS 80×80×3

SHS 80×80×3 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 80×80×3 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). They are close to interchangeable in bending: 26.3 cm³ against 25.8 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.9%. They weigh essentially the same, 7.18 kg/m and 7.07 kg/m. Both are about 80 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 80×80×3
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 80×80×3
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass7.2 kg/m7.1 kg/m+1.6%
Depth80 mm80 mmsame
Width80 mm80 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area9.1 cm²9 cm²+1.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)89.8 cm⁴87.8 cm⁴+2.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)26.3 cm³25.8 cm³+1.9%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)22.5 cm³22 cm³+2.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)89.8 cm⁴87.8 cm⁴+2.3%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)26.3 cm³25.8 cm³+1.9%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.13 cm3.12 cm+0.3%
Torsion constant (It)140 cm⁴140 cm⁴same

SHS 80×80×3 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 80×80×3 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 80×80×3.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 80×80×3 has the larger second moment of area: 89.8 cm⁴ against 87.8 cm⁴, a difference of 2.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (3.7 against 3.6 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. SHS 80×80×3 has a plastic modulus of 26.3 cm³ and CF SHS 80×80×3 has 25.8 cm³, a difference of only 1.9% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: SHS 80×80×3 is 7.18 kg/m and CF SHS 80×80×3 is 7.07 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 80×80×3 gives 25.8 cm³ of plastic modulus and 87.8 cm⁴ of inertia against 26.3 cm³ and 89.8 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

SHS 80×80×3, with a second moment of area of 89.8 cm⁴ against 87.8 cm⁴ (2.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

SHS 80×80×3.2 vs SHS 80×80×3
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…