CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

SHS 90×90×4 vs CF SHS 90×90×4

SHS 90×90×4 is an SHS Hot-finished section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); CF SHS 90×90×4 is the closest equivalent in the UK Blue Book (SCI P363). SHS 90×90×4 carries more bending: 43.6 cm³ of plastic modulus against 42.6 cm³, 2.3% more. They weigh essentially the same, 10.7 kg/m and 10.5 kg/m. Both are about 90 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertySHS 90×90×4
SHS Hot-finished
CF SHS 90×90×4
SHS Cold-formed
Difference
Mass10.7 kg/m10.5 kg/m+1.9%
Depth90 mm90 mmsame
Width90 mm90 mmsame
Web thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Flange thickness0 mm0 mmsame
Area13.6 cm²13.3 cm²+2.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)166 cm⁴162 cm⁴+2.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)43.6 cm³42.6 cm³+2.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)37 cm³36 cm³+2.8%
Second moment, minor (Iz)166 cm⁴162 cm⁴+2.5%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)43.6 cm³42.6 cm³+2.3%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.5 cm3.48 cm+0.6%
Torsion constant (It)260 cm⁴261 cm⁴-0.4%

SHS 90×90×4 to BS EN 10210-2:2006; CF SHS 90×90×4 to BS EN 10219-2:2006. Difference is expressed relative to CF SHS 90×90×4.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, SHS 90×90×4 has the larger second moment of area: 166 cm⁴ against 162 cm⁴, a difference of 2.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (4.1 against 4.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

In short, SHS 90×90×4 is the stronger section and CF SHS 90×90×4 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

SHS 90×90×4 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 43.6 cm³ against 42.6 cm³ - 2.3% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

Neither meaningfully: SHS 90×90×4 is 10.7 kg/m and CF SHS 90×90×4 is 10.5 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: CF SHS 90×90×4 gives 42.6 cm³ of plastic modulus and 162 cm⁴ of inertia against 43.6 cm³ and 166 cm⁴. Re-check deflection and the connection details before swapping, since the flange and web thicknesses differ.

SHS 90×90×4, with a second moment of area of 166 cm⁴ against 162 cm⁴ (2.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…