CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 254×146×37 vs S 10X25.4

UB 254×146×37 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); S 10X25.4 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. UB 254×146×37 carries more bending: 483 cm³ of plastic modulus against 463.75 cm³, 4.2% more. UB 254×146×37 is the lighter of the two at 37 kg/m against 37.8 kg/m, a saving of 2.1% on steel weight. Both are about 255 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 254×146×37
UB
S 10X25.4
S
Difference
Mass37 kg/m37.8 kg/m-2.1%
Depth256 mm254 mm+0.8%
Width146.4 mm118.4 mm+23.6%
Web thickness6.3 mm7.9 mm-20.3%
Flange thickness10.9 mm12.5 mm-12.8%
Area47.2 cm²48.1 cm²-1.9%
Second moment, major (Iy)5,540 cm⁴5,120 cm⁴+8.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)483 cm³463.75 cm³+4.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)433 cm³403.12 cm³+7.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)571 cm⁴280.1 cm⁴+103.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)119 cm³81.771 cm³+45.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.48 cm2.41 cm+44.4%
Torsion constant (It)15.3 cm⁴25.1 cm⁴-39.0%

UB 254×146×37 to BS EN 10365:2017; S 10X25.4 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to S 10X25.4.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 254×146×37 has the larger second moment of area: 5,540 cm⁴ against 5,120 cm⁴, a difference of 8.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UB 254×146×37 is the more efficient section: 13.1 against 12.3 cm³ per kg/m, 6.4% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: UB 254×146×37 has 119 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 81.771 cm³, 45.5% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and S to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.1% weight.

In short, UB 254×146×37 is the stronger section and UB 254×146×37 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

UB 254×146×37 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 483 cm³ against 463.75 cm³ - 4.2% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

UB 254×146×37 at 37 kg/m, against 37.8 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.1%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: S 10X25.4 gives 463.75 cm³ of plastic modulus and 5,120 cm⁴ of inertia against 483 cm³ and 5,540 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 254×146×37, with a second moment of area of 5,540 cm⁴ against 5,120 cm⁴ (8.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 270 vs UB 254×146×37
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…