CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 356×127×33 vs W 14X22

UB 356×127×33 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 14X22 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 543 cm³ against 544.05 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.2%. They weigh essentially the same, 33.1 kg/m and 32.7 kg/m. Both are about 349 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 356×127×33
UB
W 14X22
W
Difference
Mass33.1 kg/m32.7 kg/m+1.2%
Depth349 mm348 mm+0.3%
Width125.4 mm127 mm-1.3%
Web thickness6 mm5.8 mm+3.4%
Flange thickness8.5 mm8.5 mmsame
Area42.1 cm²41.9 cm²+0.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)8,250 cm⁴8,283 cm⁴-0.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)543 cm³544.05 cm³-0.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)473 cm³475.22 cm³-0.5%
Second moment, minor (Iz)280 cm⁴291.4 cm⁴-3.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)70.2 cm³71.939 cm³-2.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.58 cm2.64 cm-2.3%
Torsion constant (It)8.79 cm⁴8.66 cm⁴+1.5%

UB 356×127×33 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 14X22 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 14X22.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 14X22 has the larger second moment of area: 8,283 cm⁴ against 8,250 cm⁴, a difference of 0.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (16.4 against 16.6 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 356×127×33 has a plastic modulus of 543 cm³ and W 14X22 has 544.05 cm³, a difference of only 0.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 356×127×33 is 33.1 kg/m and W 14X22 is 32.7 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 14X22 gives 544.05 cm³ of plastic modulus and 8,283 cm⁴ of inertia against 543 cm³ and 8,250 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 14X22, with a second moment of area of 8,283 cm⁴ against 8,250 cm⁴ (0.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…