CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 356×127×39 vs W 14X26

UB 356×127×39 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 14X26 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 659 cm³ against 658.76 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 39.1 kg/m and 38.7 kg/m. Both are about 353 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 356×127×39
UB
W 14X26
W
Difference
Mass39.1 kg/m38.7 kg/m+1.0%
Depth353.4 mm353.1 mm+0.1%
Width126 mm127.8 mm-1.4%
Web thickness6.6 mm6.5 mm+1.5%
Flange thickness10.7 mm10.7 mmsame
Area49.8 cm²49.6 cm²+0.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)10,200 cm⁴10,198 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)659 cm³658.76 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)576 cm³578.46 cm³-0.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)358 cm⁴370.9 cm⁴-3.5%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)89 cm³90.784 cm³-2.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)2.68 cm2.74 cm-2.2%
Torsion constant (It)15.1 cm⁴14.9 cm⁴+1.3%

UB 356×127×39 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 14X26 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 14X26.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 356×127×39 has the larger second moment of area: 10,200 cm⁴ against 10,198 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (16.9 against 17.0 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 356×127×39 has a plastic modulus of 659 cm³ and W 14X26 has 658.76 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 356×127×39 is 39.1 kg/m and W 14X26 is 38.7 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 14X26 gives 658.76 cm³ of plastic modulus and 10,198 cm⁴ of inertia against 659 cm³ and 10,200 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 356×127×39, with a second moment of area of 10,200 cm⁴ against 10,198 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…