CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 356×171×45 vs W 14X30

UB 356×171×45 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 14X30 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 775 cm³ against 775.11 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 45 kg/m and 44.6 kg/m. Both are about 351 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 356×171×45
UB
W 14X30
W
Difference
Mass45 kg/m44.6 kg/m+0.9%
Depth351.4 mm350.5 mm+0.3%
Width171.1 mm170.9 mm+0.1%
Web thickness7 mm6.9 mm+1.4%
Flange thickness9.7 mm9.8 mm-1.0%
Area57.3 cm²57.1 cm²+0.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)12,100 cm⁴12,112 cm⁴-0.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)775 cm³775.11 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)687 cm³688.26 cm³-0.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)811 cm⁴815.8 cm⁴-0.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)147 cm³147.32 cm³-0.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.76 cm3.78 cm-0.5%
Torsion constant (It)15.8 cm⁴15.82 cm⁴-0.1%

UB 356×171×45 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 14X30 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 14X30.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 14X30 has the larger second moment of area: 12,112 cm⁴ against 12,100 cm⁴, a difference of 0.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (17.2 against 17.4 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 356×171×45 has a plastic modulus of 775 cm³ and W 14X30 has 775.11 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 356×171×45 is 45 kg/m and W 14X30 is 44.6 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 14X30 gives 775.11 cm³ of plastic modulus and 12,112 cm⁴ of inertia against 775 cm³ and 12,100 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 14X30, with a second moment of area of 12,112 cm⁴ against 12,100 cm⁴ (0.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…