CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 406×178×85 vs H-400x200x10x18

UB 406×178×85 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); H-400x200x10x18 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. H-400x200x10x18 carries more bending: 1815 cm³ of plastic modulus against 1730 cm³, 4.7% more. UB 406×178×85 is the lighter of the two at 85.3 kg/m against 88.2 kg/m, a saving of 3.3% on steel weight. Both are about 414 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 406×178×85
UB
H-400x200x10x18
MB & MC
Difference
Mass85.3 kg/m88.2 kg/m-3.3%
Depth417.2 mm410 mm+1.8%
Width181.9 mm202 mm-10.0%
Web thickness10.9 mm10 mm+9.0%
Flange thickness18.2 mm18 mm+1.1%
Area109 cm²112 cm²-2.7%
Second moment, major (Iy)31,700 cm⁴33,060 cm⁴-4.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,730 cm³1,815 cm³-4.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,520 cm³1,612 cm³-5.7%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,830 cm⁴2,478 cm⁴-26.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)313 cm³378 cm³-17.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.11 cm4.7 cm-12.6%
Torsion constant (It)93 cm⁴101 cm⁴-7.9%

UB 406×178×85 to BS EN 10365:2017; H-400x200x10x18 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-400x200x10x18.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-400x200x10x18 has the larger second moment of area: 33,060 cm⁴ against 31,700 cm⁴, a difference of 4.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (20.3 against 20.6 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: H-400x200x10x18 has 378 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 313 cm³, 17.2% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 3.3% weight.

In short, H-400x200x10x18 is the stronger section and UB 406×178×85 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

H-400x200x10x18 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 1815 cm³ against 1730 cm³ - 4.7% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

UB 406×178×85 at 85.3 kg/m, against 88.2 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.3%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-400x200x10x18 gives 1815 cm³ of plastic modulus and 33,060 cm⁴ of inertia against 1730 cm³ and 31,700 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-400x200x10x18, with a second moment of area of 33,060 cm⁴ against 31,700 cm⁴ (4.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 406×178×85 vs IPE V 400UB 406×178×85 vs W 16X57
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…