CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 457×152×60 vs W 18X40

UB 457×152×60 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 18X40 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 1290 cm³ against 1284.7 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.4%. They weigh essentially the same, 59.8 kg/m and 59.5 kg/m. Both are about 455 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 457×152×60
UB
W 18X40
W
Difference
Mass59.8 kg/m59.5 kg/m+0.5%
Depth454.6 mm454.7 mmsame
Width152.9 mm152.9 mmsame
Web thickness8.1 mm8 mm+1.2%
Flange thickness13.3 mm13.3 mmsame
Area76.2 cm²76.1 cm²+0.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)25,500 cm⁴25,473 cm⁴+0.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,290 cm³1,284.7 cm³+0.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,120 cm³1,120.9 cm³-0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)795 cm⁴795 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)163 cm³163.87 cm³-0.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.23 cm3.23 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)33.8 cm⁴33.71 cm⁴+0.3%

UB 457×152×60 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 18X40 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 18X40.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 457×152×60 has the larger second moment of area: 25,500 cm⁴ against 25,473 cm⁴, a difference of 0.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (21.6 against 21.6 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 457×152×60 has a plastic modulus of 1290 cm³ and W 18X40 has 1284.7 cm³, a difference of only 0.4% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 457×152×60 is 59.8 kg/m and W 18X40 is 59.5 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 18X40 gives 1284.7 cm³ of plastic modulus and 25,473 cm⁴ of inertia against 1290 cm³ and 25,500 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 457×152×60, with a second moment of area of 25,500 cm⁴ against 25,473 cm⁴ (0.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…