CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 457×152×74 vs S 18X54.7

UB 457×152×74 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); S 18X54.7 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. S 18X54.7 carries more bending: 1704.3 cm³ of plastic modulus against 1630 cm³, 4.4% more. UB 457×152×74 is the lighter of the two at 74.2 kg/m against 81.4 kg/m, a saving of 8.8% on steel weight. Both are about 460 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 457×152×74
UB
S 18X54.7
S
Difference
Mass74.2 kg/m81.4 kg/m-8.8%
Depth462 mm457.2 mm+1.0%
Width154.4 mm152.4 mm+1.3%
Web thickness9.6 mm11.7 mm-17.9%
Flange thickness17 mm17.6 mm-3.4%
Area94.5 cm²103.2 cm²-8.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)32,700 cm⁴33,340 cm⁴-1.9%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,630 cm³1,704.3 cm³-4.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,410 cm³1,458.4 cm³-3.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,050 cm⁴861.6 cm⁴+21.9%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)213 cm³198.28 cm³+7.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.33 cm2.9 cm+14.8%
Torsion constant (It)65.9 cm⁴96.98 cm⁴-32.0%

UB 457×152×74 to BS EN 10365:2017; S 18X54.7 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to S 18X54.7.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, S 18X54.7 has the larger second moment of area: 33,340 cm⁴ against 32,700 cm⁴, a difference of 1.9%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UB 457×152×74 is the more efficient section: 22.0 against 20.9 cm³ per kg/m, 4.9% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and S to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 8.8% weight.

In short, S 18X54.7 is the stronger section and UB 457×152×74 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

S 18X54.7 is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 1704.3 cm³ against 1630 cm³ - 4.4% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

UB 457×152×74 at 74.2 kg/m, against 81.4 kg/m for the other - a saving of 8.8%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: S 18X54.7 gives 1704.3 cm³ of plastic modulus and 33,340 cm⁴ of inertia against 1630 cm³ and 32,700 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

S 18X54.7, with a second moment of area of 33,340 cm⁴ against 32,700 cm⁴ (1.9% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 450 vs S 18X54.7UB 457×191×74 vs S 18X54.7UB 457×152×74 vs IPE 450UB 457×152×74 vs W 18X50UB 457×152×74 vs H-450x200x9x14-74.9W 18X50 vs S 18X54.7
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…