CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 457×191×89 vs S 18X70

UB 457×191×89 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); S 18X70 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2010 cm³ against 2032 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 1.1%. UB 457×191×89 is the lighter of the two at 89.3 kg/m against 104.2 kg/m, a saving of 14.3% on steel weight. Both are about 460 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 457×191×89
UB
S 18X70
S
Difference
Mass89.3 kg/m104.2 kg/m-14.3%
Depth463.4 mm457.2 mm+1.4%
Width191.9 mm158.8 mm+20.8%
Web thickness10.5 mm18.1 mm-42.0%
Flange thickness17.7 mm17.6 mm+0.6%
Area114 cm²132.3 cm²-13.8%
Second moment, major (Iy)41,000 cm⁴38,418 cm⁴+6.7%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,010 cm³2,032 cm³-1.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,770 cm³1,687.9 cm³+4.9%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,090 cm⁴999 cm⁴+109.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)338 cm³234.34 cm³+44.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.29 cm2.74 cm+56.6%
Torsion constant (It)90.7 cm⁴170.7 cm⁴-46.9%

UB 457×191×89 to BS EN 10365:2017; S 18X70 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to S 18X70.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 457×191×89 has the larger second moment of area: 41,000 cm⁴ against 38,418 cm⁴, a difference of 6.7%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UB 457×191×89 is the more efficient section: 22.5 against 19.5 cm³ per kg/m, 15.4% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: UB 457×191×89 has 338 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 234.34 cm³, 44.2% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and S to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 14.3% weight.

In short, S 18X70 is the stronger section and UB 457×191×89 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 457×191×89 has a plastic modulus of 2010 cm³ and S 18X70 has 2032 cm³, a difference of only 1.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

UB 457×191×89 at 89.3 kg/m, against 104.2 kg/m for the other - a saving of 14.3%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: S 18X70 gives 2032 cm³ of plastic modulus and 38,418 cm⁴ of inertia against 2010 cm³ and 41,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 457×191×89, with a second moment of area of 41,000 cm⁴ against 38,418 cm⁴ (6.7% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 457×191×89 vs IPE O 450UB 457×191×89 vs W 18X60UB 457×191×89 vs H-450x200x10x17W 18X60 vs S 18X70
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…