CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 533×210×101 vs W 21X68

UB 533×210×101 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 21X68 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2610 cm³ against 2621.9 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.5%. They weigh essentially the same, 101 kg/m and 101.2 kg/m. Both are about 536 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 533×210×101
UB
W 21X68
W
Difference
Mass101 kg/m101.2 kg/m-0.2%
Depth536.7 mm535.9 mm+0.1%
Width210 mm210.1 mmsame
Web thickness10.8 mm10.9 mm-0.9%
Flange thickness17.4 mm17.4 mmsame
Area129 cm²129 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)61,500 cm⁴61,602 cm⁴-0.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,610 cm³2,621.9 cm³-0.5%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,290 cm³2,294.2 cm³-0.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,690 cm⁴2,693 cm⁴-0.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)399 cm³399.84 cm³-0.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.57 cm4.57 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)101 cm⁴102 cm⁴-1.0%

UB 533×210×101 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 21X68 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 21X68.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 21X68 has the larger second moment of area: 61,602 cm⁴ against 61,500 cm⁴, a difference of 0.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (25.8 against 25.9 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 533×210×101 has a plastic modulus of 2610 cm³ and W 21X68 has 2621.9 cm³, a difference of only 0.5% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 533×210×101 is 101 kg/m and W 21X68 is 101.2 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 21X68 gives 2621.9 cm³ of plastic modulus and 61,602 cm⁴ of inertia against 2610 cm³ and 61,500 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 21X68, with a second moment of area of 61,602 cm⁴ against 61,500 cm⁴ (0.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 533×210×101 vs IPE O 500W 21X68 vs IPE O 500
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…