CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 533×210×109 vs W 21X73

UB 533×210×109 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 21X73 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2830 cm³ against 2818.6 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.4%. They weigh essentially the same, 109 kg/m and 108.6 kg/m. Both are about 539 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 533×210×109
UB
W 21X73
W
Difference
Mass109 kg/m108.6 kg/m+0.4%
Depth539.5 mm538.5 mm+0.2%
Width210.8 mm210.8 mmsame
Web thickness11.6 mm11.6 mmsame
Flange thickness18.8 mm18.8 mmsame
Area139 cm²138.7 cm²+0.2%
Second moment, major (Iy)66,800 cm⁴66,597 cm⁴+0.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,830 cm³2,818.6 cm³+0.4%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,480 cm³2,474.4 cm³+0.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)2,940 cm⁴2,939 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)436 cm³435.9 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.6 cm4.6 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)126 cm⁴125.7 cm⁴+0.2%

UB 533×210×109 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 21X73 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 21X73.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 533×210×109 has the larger second moment of area: 66,800 cm⁴ against 66,597 cm⁴, a difference of 0.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (26.0 against 26.0 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 533×210×109 has a plastic modulus of 2830 cm³ and W 21X73 has 2818.6 cm³, a difference of only 0.4% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 533×210×109 is 109 kg/m and W 21X73 is 108.6 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 21X73 gives 2818.6 cm³ of plastic modulus and 66,597 cm⁴ of inertia against 2830 cm³ and 66,800 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 533×210×109, with a second moment of area of 66,800 cm⁴ against 66,597 cm⁴ (0.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

IPE 550 vs UB 533×210×109IPE 550 vs W 21X73
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…