CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 533×210×138 vs W 21X93

UB 533×210×138 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 21X93 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 3610 cm³ against 3621.5 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.3%. They weigh essentially the same, 138.3 kg/m and 138.4 kg/m. Both are about 549 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 533×210×138
UB
W 21X93
W
Difference
Mass138.3 kg/m138.4 kg/m-0.1%
Depth549.1 mm548.6 mm+0.1%
Width213.9 mm213.9 mmsame
Web thickness14.7 mm14.7 mmsame
Flange thickness23.6 mm23.6 mmsame
Area176 cm²176.1 cm²-0.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)86,100 cm⁴86,160 cm⁴-0.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)3,610 cm³3,621.5 cm³-0.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)3,140 cm³3,146.3 cm³-0.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)3,860 cm⁴3,867 cm⁴-0.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)568 cm³568.63 cm³-0.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)4.68 cm4.67 cm+0.2%
Torsion constant (It)250 cm⁴251 cm⁴-0.4%

UB 533×210×138 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 21X93 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 21X93.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 21X93 has the larger second moment of area: 86,160 cm⁴ against 86,100 cm⁴, a difference of 0.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (26.1 against 26.2 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 533×210×138 has a plastic modulus of 3610 cm³ and W 21X93 has 3621.5 cm³, a difference of only 0.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 533×210×138 is 138.3 kg/m and W 21X93 is 138.4 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 21X93 gives 3621.5 cm³ of plastic modulus and 86,160 cm⁴ of inertia against 3610 cm³ and 86,100 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 21X93, with a second moment of area of 86,160 cm⁴ against 86,100 cm⁴ (0.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 533×210×138 vs HE 600 AAW 21X93 vs HE 600 AA
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…