CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 533×312×182 vs W 21X122

UB 533×312×182 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 21X122 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 5040 cm³ against 5030.8 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.2%. They weigh essentially the same, 181.5 kg/m and 181.6 kg/m. Both are about 551 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 533×312×182
UB
W 21X122
W
Difference
Mass181.5 kg/m181.6 kg/m-0.1%
Depth550.7 mm551.2 mm-0.1%
Width314.5 mm315 mm-0.2%
Web thickness15.2 mm15.2 mmsame
Flange thickness24.4 mm24.4 mmsame
Area231 cm²231.6 cm²-0.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)123,000 cm⁴123,205 cm⁴-0.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)5,040 cm³5,030.8 cm³+0.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)4,480 cm³4,473.7 cm³+0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)12,700 cm⁴12,695 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,240 cm³1,238.9 cm³+0.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.4 cm7.42 cm-0.3%
Torsion constant (It)373 cm⁴373.8 cm⁴-0.2%

UB 533×312×182 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 21X122 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 21X122.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 21X122 has the larger second moment of area: 123,205 cm⁴ against 123,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (27.8 against 27.7 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 533×312×182 has a plastic modulus of 5040 cm³ and W 21X122 has 5030.8 cm³, a difference of only 0.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 533×312×182 is 181.5 kg/m and W 21X122 is 181.6 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 21X122 gives 5030.8 cm³ of plastic modulus and 123,205 cm⁴ of inertia against 5040 cm³ and 123,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 21X122, with a second moment of area of 123,205 cm⁴ against 123,000 cm⁴ (0.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 533×312×182 vs H-600x300x14x23-170W 21X122 vs H-600x300x14x23-170
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…