CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 610×178×82 vs W 24X55

UB 610×178×82 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 24X55 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2190 cm³ against 2195.9 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.3%. They weigh essentially the same, 81.8 kg/m and 81.8 kg/m. Both are about 599 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 610×178×82
UB
W 24X55
W
Difference
Mass81.8 kg/m81.8 kg/msame
Depth598.6 mm599.4 mm-0.1%
Width177.9 mm178.1 mm-0.1%
Web thickness10 mm10 mmsame
Flange thickness12.8 mm12.8 mmsame
Area104 cm²104.5 cm²-0.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)55,900 cm⁴56,191 cm⁴-0.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,190 cm³2,195.9 cm³-0.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,870 cm³1,868.1 cm³+0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,210 cm⁴1,211 cm⁴-0.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)218 cm³217.95 cm³same
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.4 cm3.4 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)48.8 cm⁴49.12 cm⁴-0.7%

UB 610×178×82 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 24X55 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 24X55.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 24X55 has the larger second moment of area: 56,191 cm⁴ against 55,900 cm⁴, a difference of 0.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (26.8 against 26.8 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 610×178×82 has a plastic modulus of 2190 cm³ and W 24X55 has 2195.9 cm³, a difference of only 0.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 610×178×82 is 81.8 kg/m and W 24X55 is 81.8 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 24X55 gives 2195.9 cm³ of plastic modulus and 56,191 cm⁴ of inertia against 2190 cm³ and 55,900 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 24X55, with a second moment of area of 56,191 cm⁴ against 55,900 cm⁴ (0.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 610×178×82 vs H-600x200x8x13W 24X55 vs H-600x200x8x13
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…