CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 686×254×152 vs W 27X102

UB 686×254×152 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 27X102 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 5000 cm³ against 4998.1 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 152.4 kg/m and 151.8 kg/m. Both are about 688 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 686×254×152
UB
W 27X102
W
Difference
Mass152.4 kg/m151.8 kg/m+0.4%
Depth687.5 mm688.3 mm-0.1%
Width254.5 mm254 mm+0.2%
Web thickness13.2 mm13.1 mm+0.8%
Flange thickness21 mm21.1 mm-0.5%
Area194 cm²193.5 cm²+0.3%
Second moment, major (Iy)150,000 cm⁴150,676 cm⁴-0.4%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)5,000 cm³4,998.1 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)4,370 cm³4,375.3 cm³-0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)5,780 cm⁴5,786 cm⁴-0.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)710 cm³711.2 cm³-0.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.46 cm5.46 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)220 cm⁴219.8 cm⁴+0.1%

UB 686×254×152 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 27X102 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 27X102.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 27X102 has the larger second moment of area: 150,676 cm⁴ against 150,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.4%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (32.8 against 32.9 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 686×254×152 has a plastic modulus of 5000 cm³ and W 27X102 has 4998.1 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 686×254×152 is 152.4 kg/m and W 27X102 is 151.8 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 27X102 gives 4998.1 cm³ of plastic modulus and 150,676 cm⁴ of inertia against 5000 cm³ and 150,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 27X102, with a second moment of area of 150,676 cm⁴ against 150,000 cm⁴ (0.4% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 686×254×152 vs HE 700 AAW 27X102 vs HE 700 AA
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…