CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 686×254×170 vs W 27X114

UB 686×254×170 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 27X114 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 5630 cm³ against 5620.8 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.2%. They weigh essentially the same, 170.2 kg/m and 169.7 kg/m. Both are about 693 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 686×254×170
UB
W 27X114
W
Difference
Mass170.2 kg/m169.7 kg/m+0.3%
Depth692.9 mm693.4 mm-0.1%
Width255.8 mm256.5 mm-0.3%
Web thickness14.5 mm14.5 mmsame
Flange thickness23.7 mm23.6 mm+0.4%
Area217 cm²216.8 cm²+0.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)170,000 cm⁴169,822 cm⁴+0.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)5,630 cm³5,620.8 cm³+0.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)4,920 cm³4,899.7 cm³+0.4%
Second moment, minor (Iz)6,630 cm⁴6,618 cm⁴+0.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)811 cm³807.88 cm³+0.4%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.53 cm5.54 cm-0.2%
Torsion constant (It)308 cm⁴305.1 cm⁴+1.0%

UB 686×254×170 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 27X114 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 27X114.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 686×254×170 has the larger second moment of area: 170,000 cm⁴ against 169,822 cm⁴, a difference of 0.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (33.1 against 33.1 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 686×254×170 has a plastic modulus of 5630 cm³ and W 27X114 has 5620.8 cm³, a difference of only 0.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 686×254×170 is 170.2 kg/m and W 27X114 is 169.7 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 27X114 gives 5620.8 cm³ of plastic modulus and 169,822 cm⁴ of inertia against 5630 cm³ and 170,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 686×254×170, with a second moment of area of 170,000 cm⁴ against 169,822 cm⁴ (0.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 686×254×170 vs H-700x300x13x20W 27X114 vs H-700x300x13x20
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…