CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 762×267×197 vs IPE 750 x 196

UB 762×267×197 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); IPE 750 x 196 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 7170 cm³ against 7170 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.0%. They weigh essentially the same, 196.8 kg/m and 196 kg/m. Both are about 770 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 762×267×197
UB
IPE 750 x 196
IPE
Difference
Mass196.8 kg/m196 kg/m+0.4%
Depth769.8 mm770 mmsame
Width268 mm268 mmsame
Web thickness15.6 mm15.6 mmsame
Flange thickness25.4 mm25.4 mmsame
Area251 cm²251 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)240,000 cm⁴240,000 cm⁴same
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)7,170 cm³7,170 cm³same
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)6,230 cm³6,240 cm³-0.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)8,170 cm⁴8,180 cm⁴-0.1%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)958 cm³959 cm³-0.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.71 cm5.71 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)404 cm⁴406 cm⁴-0.5%

UB 762×267×197 to BS EN 10365:2017; IPE 750 x 196 to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to IPE 750 x 196.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, IPE 750 x 196 has the larger second moment of area: 240,000 cm⁴ against 240,000 cm⁴, a difference of 0.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (36.4 against 36.6 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and IPE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 762×267×197 has a plastic modulus of 7170 cm³ and IPE 750 x 196 has 7170 cm³, a difference of only 0.0% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 762×267×197 is 196.8 kg/m and IPE 750 x 196 is 196 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: IPE 750 x 196 gives 7170 cm³ of plastic modulus and 240,000 cm⁴ of inertia against 7170 cm³ and 240,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

IPE 750 x 196, with a second moment of area of 240,000 cm⁴ against 240,000 cm⁴ (0.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UB 762×267×197 vs W 30X132UB 762×267×197 vs H-800x300x14x22W 30X132 vs IPE 750 x 196
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…