CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UB 838×292×176 vs W 33X118

UB 838×292×176 is an UB section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 33X118 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 6810 cm³ against 6800.6 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.1%. They weigh essentially the same, 175.9 kg/m and 175.6 kg/m. Both are about 835 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUB 838×292×176
UB
W 33X118
W
Difference
Mass175.9 kg/m175.6 kg/m+0.2%
Depth834.9 mm835.7 mm-0.1%
Width291.7 mm292.1 mm-0.1%
Web thickness14 mm14 mmsame
Flange thickness18.8 mm18.8 mmsame
Area224 cm²223.9 cm²same
Second moment, major (Iy)246,000 cm⁴245,577 cm⁴+0.2%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)6,810 cm³6,800.6 cm³+0.1%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)5,890 cm³5,883 cm³+0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)7,800 cm⁴7,784 cm⁴+0.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)842 cm³840.66 cm³+0.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.9 cm5.89 cm+0.2%
Torsion constant (It)221 cm⁴220.6 cm⁴+0.2%

UB 838×292×176 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 33X118 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 33X118.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UB 838×292×176 has the larger second moment of area: 246,000 cm⁴ against 245,577 cm⁴, a difference of 0.2%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (38.7 against 38.7 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UB sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UB 838×292×176 has a plastic modulus of 6810 cm³ and W 33X118 has 6800.6 cm³, a difference of only 0.1% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UB 838×292×176 is 175.9 kg/m and W 33X118 is 175.6 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 33X118 gives 6800.6 cm³ of plastic modulus and 245,577 cm⁴ of inertia against 6810 cm³ and 246,000 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UB 838×292×176, with a second moment of area of 246,000 cm⁴ against 245,577 cm⁴ (0.2% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…