CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 152×152×37 vs W 6X25

UC 152×152×37 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 6X25 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 309 cm³ against 309.72 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.2%. They weigh essentially the same, 37 kg/m and 37.2 kg/m. Both are about 162 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 152×152×37
UC
W 6X25
W
Difference
Mass37 kg/m37.2 kg/m-0.5%
Depth161.8 mm162.1 mm-0.2%
Width154.4 mm154.4 mmsame
Web thickness8 mm8.1 mm-1.2%
Flange thickness11.5 mm11.6 mm-0.9%
Area47.1 cm²47.4 cm²-0.6%
Second moment, major (Iy)2,210 cm⁴2,223 cm⁴-0.6%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)309 cm³309.72 cm³-0.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)273 cm³273.66 cm³-0.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)706 cm⁴711.8 cm⁴-0.8%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)140 cm³140.27 cm³-0.2%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)3.87 cm3.86 cm+0.3%
Torsion constant (It)19.2 cm⁴19.19 cm⁴+0.1%

UC 152×152×37 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 6X25 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 6X25.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 6X25 has the larger second moment of area: 2,223 cm⁴ against 2,210 cm⁴, a difference of 0.6%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (8.4 against 8.3 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UC 152×152×37 has a plastic modulus of 309 cm³ and W 6X25 has 309.72 cm³, a difference of only 0.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UC 152×152×37 is 37 kg/m and W 6X25 is 37.2 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 6X25 gives 309.72 cm³ of plastic modulus and 2,223 cm⁴ of inertia against 309 cm³ and 2,210 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 6X25, with a second moment of area of 2,223 cm⁴ against 2,210 cm⁴ (0.6% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…