CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 203×203×52 vs HE 220 A

UC 203×203×52 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); HE 220 A is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 567 cm³ against 568 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.2%. HE 220 A is the lighter of the two at 50.5 kg/m against 52 kg/m, a saving of 3.0% on steel weight. Both are about 208 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 203×203×52
UC
HE 220 A
HE
Difference
Mass52 kg/m50.5 kg/m+3.0%
Depth206.2 mm210 mm-1.8%
Width204.3 mm220 mm-7.1%
Web thickness7.9 mm7 mm+12.9%
Flange thickness12.5 mm11 mm+13.6%
Area66.3 cm²64.3 cm²+3.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)5,260 cm⁴5,410 cm⁴-2.8%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)567 cm³568 cm³-0.2%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)510 cm³515 cm³-1.0%
Second moment, minor (Iz)1,780 cm⁴1,960 cm⁴-9.2%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)264 cm³271 cm³-2.6%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)5.18 cm5.51 cm-6.0%
Torsion constant (It)31.8 cm⁴28.6 cm⁴+11.2%

UC 203×203×52 to BS EN 10365:2017; HE 220 A to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 220 A.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 220 A has the larger second moment of area: 5,410 cm⁴ against 5,260 cm⁴, a difference of 2.8%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, HE 220 A is the more efficient section: 11.2 against 10.9 cm³ per kg/m, 3.1% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 3.0% weight.

In short, HE 220 A is the stronger section and HE 220 A is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UC 203×203×52 has a plastic modulus of 567 cm³ and HE 220 A has 568 cm³, a difference of only 0.2% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

HE 220 A at 50.5 kg/m, against 52 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.0%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 220 A gives 568 cm³ of plastic modulus and 5,410 cm⁴ of inertia against 567 cm³ and 5,260 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 220 A, with a second moment of area of 5,410 cm⁴ against 5,260 cm⁴ (2.8% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 203×203×52 vs W 8X35UC 203×203×52 vs HP 8X36W 8X35 vs HE 220 AHE 220 A vs HP 8X36
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…