CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 254×254×89 vs HE 260 B

UC 254×254×89 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); HE 260 B is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. HE 260 B carries more bending: 1280 cm³ of plastic modulus against 1220 cm³, 4.7% more. UC 254×254×89 is the lighter of the two at 88.9 kg/m against 93 kg/m, a saving of 4.4% on steel weight. Both are about 260 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 254×254×89
UC
HE 260 B
HE
Difference
Mass88.9 kg/m93 kg/m-4.4%
Depth260.3 mm260 mm+0.1%
Width256.3 mm260 mm-1.4%
Web thickness10.3 mm10 mm+3.0%
Flange thickness17.3 mm17.5 mm-1.1%
Area113 cm²118 cm²-4.2%
Second moment, major (Iy)14,300 cm⁴14,900 cm⁴-4.0%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)1,220 cm³1,280 cm³-4.7%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)1,100 cm³1,150 cm³-4.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)4,860 cm⁴5,140 cm⁴-5.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)575 cm³602 cm³-4.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)6.55 cm6.58 cm-0.5%
Torsion constant (It)102 cm⁴127 cm⁴-19.7%

UC 254×254×89 to BS EN 10365:2017; HE 260 B to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 260 B.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, HE 260 B has the larger second moment of area: 14,900 cm⁴ against 14,300 cm⁴, a difference of 4.0%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (13.7 against 13.8 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 4.4% weight.

In short, HE 260 B is the stronger section and UC 254×254×89 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

HE 260 B is the stronger of the two in bending, with a plastic modulus of 1280 cm³ against 1220 cm³ - 4.7% more. At the same steel grade that translates directly into moment capacity, since M_pl,Rd = W_pl x f_y / gamma_M0.

UC 254×254×89 at 88.9 kg/m, against 93 kg/m for the other - a saving of 4.4%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 260 B gives 1280 cm³ of plastic modulus and 14,900 cm⁴ of inertia against 1220 cm³ and 14,300 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

HE 260 B, with a second moment of area of 14,900 cm⁴ against 14,300 cm⁴ (4.0% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 254×254×89 vs W 10X60W 10X60 vs HE 260 BHE 260 B vs H-250x250x12x19
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…