CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 305×305×158 vs W 12X106

UC 305×305×158 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); W 12X106 is the closest equivalent in the American AISC Shapes Database. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2680 cm³ against 2687.5 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.3%. They weigh essentially the same, 158.1 kg/m and 157.7 kg/m. Both are about 327 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 305×305×158
UC
W 12X106
W
Difference
Mass158.1 kg/m157.7 kg/m+0.3%
Depth327.1 mm327.7 mm-0.2%
Width311.2 mm309.9 mm+0.4%
Web thickness15.8 mm15.5 mm+1.9%
Flange thickness25 mm25.1 mm-0.4%
Area201 cm²201.3 cm²-0.1%
Second moment, major (Iy)38,700 cm⁴38,834 cm⁴-0.3%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,680 cm³2,687.5 cm³-0.3%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,370 cm³2,376.1 cm³-0.3%
Second moment, minor (Iz)12,600 cm⁴12,529 cm⁴+0.6%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,230 cm³1,230.7 cm³-0.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)7.9 cm7.9 cmsame
Torsion constant (It)378 cm⁴380 cm⁴-0.5%

UC 305×305×158 to BS EN 10365:2017; W 12X106 to AISC Shapes Database v16.0. Difference is expressed relative to W 12X106.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, W 12X106 has the larger second moment of area: 38,834 cm⁴ against 38,700 cm⁴, a difference of 0.3%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram, the two are equally efficient (17.0 against 17.0 cm³ per kg/m), so on a pure steel-tonnage basis there is nothing to choose between them. The decision comes down to availability, connection detailing and what the rest of the frame uses.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and W to AISC Shapes Database v16.0; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save a marginal amount of weight.

In short, these two are genuine equivalents. Pick whichever your supplier stocks and the rest of the frame already uses.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UC 305×305×158 has a plastic modulus of 2680 cm³ and W 12X106 has 2687.5 cm³, a difference of only 0.3% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

Neither meaningfully: UC 305×305×158 is 158.1 kg/m and W 12X106 is 157.7 kg/m. On a tonnage basis they cost the same.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: W 12X106 gives 2687.5 cm³ of plastic modulus and 38,834 cm⁴ of inertia against 2680 cm³ and 38,700 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and AISC Shapes Database v16.0), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

W 12X106, with a second moment of area of 38,834 cm⁴ against 38,700 cm⁴ (0.3% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 305×305×158 vs HE 360 BW 12X106 vs HE 360 B
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…