CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 356×368×153 vs H-350x350x14x22

UC 356×368×153 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); H-350x350x14x22 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 2960 cm³ against 2979 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.6%. UC 356×368×153 is the lighter of the two at 152.9 kg/m against 159 kg/m, a saving of 3.8% on steel weight. Both are about 359 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 356×368×153
UC
H-350x350x14x22
MB & MC
Difference
Mass152.9 kg/m159 kg/m-3.8%
Depth362 mm356 mm+1.7%
Width370.5 mm352 mm+5.3%
Web thickness12.3 mm14 mm-12.1%
Flange thickness20.7 mm22 mm-5.9%
Area195 cm²202 cm²-3.5%
Second moment, major (Iy)48,600 cm⁴47,590 cm⁴+2.1%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)2,960 cm³2,979 cm³-0.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)2,680 cm³2,674 cm³+0.2%
Second moment, minor (Iz)17,600 cm⁴16,000 cm⁴+10.0%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,430 cm³1,382 cm³+3.5%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)9.49 cm8.9 cm+6.6%
Torsion constant (It)251 cm⁴305 cm⁴-17.7%

UC 356×368×153 to BS EN 10365:2017; H-350x350x14x22 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-350x350x14x22.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UC 356×368×153 has the larger second moment of area: 48,600 cm⁴ against 47,590 cm⁴, a difference of 2.1%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UC 356×368×153 is the more efficient section: 19.4 against 18.7 cm³ per kg/m, 3.3% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 3.8% weight.

In short, H-350x350x14x22 is the stronger section and UC 356×368×153 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UC 356×368×153 has a plastic modulus of 2960 cm³ and H-350x350x14x22 has 2979 cm³, a difference of only 0.6% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

UC 356×368×153 at 152.9 kg/m, against 159 kg/m for the other - a saving of 3.8%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-350x350x14x22 gives 2979 cm³ of plastic modulus and 47,590 cm⁴ of inertia against 2960 cm³ and 48,600 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UC 356×368×153, with a second moment of area of 48,600 cm⁴ against 47,590 cm⁴ (2.1% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 356×368×153 vs W 14X99
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…