CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 356×368×202 vs H-400x400x21x21

UC 356×368×202 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); H-400x400x21x21 is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 3970 cm³ against 3992 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.6%. H-400x400x21x21 is the lighter of the two at 197 kg/m against 201.9 kg/m, a saving of 2.5% on steel weight. H-400x400x21x21 is deeper, 400 mm against 374.6 mm, which matters where the floor zone is tight.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 356×368×202
UC
H-400x400x21x21
MB & MC
Difference
Mass201.9 kg/m197 kg/m+2.5%
Depth374.6 mm400 mm-6.3%
Width374.7 mm408 mm-8.2%
Web thickness16.5 mm21 mm-21.4%
Flange thickness27 mm21 mm+28.6%
Area257 cm²251 cm²+2.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)66,300 cm⁴70,890 cm⁴-6.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)3,970 cm³3,992 cm³-0.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)3,540 cm³3,545 cm³-0.1%
Second moment, minor (Iz)23,700 cm⁴23,810 cm⁴-0.5%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)1,920 cm³1,794 cm³+7.0%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)9.6 cm9.75 cm-1.5%
Torsion constant (It)558 cm⁴415 cm⁴+34.5%

UC 356×368×202 to BS EN 10365:2017; H-400x400x21x21 to Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to H-400x400x21x21.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, H-400x400x21x21 has the larger second moment of area: 70,890 cm⁴ against 66,300 cm⁴, a difference of 6.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, H-400x400x21x21 is the more efficient section: 20.3 against 19.7 cm³ per kg/m, 3.0% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and MB & MC to Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 2.5% weight.

In short, H-400x400x21x21 is the stronger section and H-400x400x21x21 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UC 356×368×202 has a plastic modulus of 3970 cm³ and H-400x400x21x21 has 3992 cm³, a difference of only 0.6% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

H-400x400x21x21 at 197 kg/m, against 201.9 kg/m for the other - a saving of 2.5%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: H-400x400x21x21 gives 3992 cm³ of plastic modulus and 70,890 cm⁴ of inertia against 3970 cm³ and 66,300 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

H-400x400x21x21, with a second moment of area of 70,890 cm⁴ against 66,300 cm⁴ (6.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 356×368×202 vs W 14X132W 12X152 vs UC 356×368×202
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…