CivilAxisCivilAxis
☕ Support🌐 Community

UC 356×406×235 vs HE 340 M

UC 356×406×235 is an UC section from the UK Blue Book (SCI P363); HE 340 M is the closest equivalent in the European (Continental) range. They are close to interchangeable in bending: 4690 cm³ against 4720 cm³ of plastic modulus, a difference of 0.6%. UC 356×406×235 is the lighter of the two at 235.1 kg/m against 248 kg/m, a saving of 5.2% on steel weight. Both are about 379 mm deep, so either fits the same construction zone.

Section properties side by side. Bold marks the more favourable value where one is.
PropertyUC 356×406×235
UC
HE 340 M
HE
Difference
Mass235.1 kg/m248 kg/m-5.2%
Depth381 mm377 mm+1.1%
Width394.8 mm309 mm+27.8%
Web thickness18.4 mm21 mm-12.4%
Flange thickness30.2 mm40 mm-24.5%
Area299 cm²316 cm²-5.4%
Second moment, major (Iy)79,100 cm⁴76,400 cm⁴+3.5%
Plastic modulus, major (Wpl,y)4,690 cm³4,720 cm³-0.6%
Elastic modulus, major (Wel,y)4,150 cm³4,050 cm³+2.5%
Second moment, minor (Iz)31,000 cm⁴19,700 cm⁴+57.4%
Plastic modulus, minor (Wpl,z)2,380 cm³1,950 cm³+22.1%
Radius of gyration, minor (iz)10.2 cm7.9 cm+29.1%
Torsion constant (It)812 cm⁴1,510 cm⁴-46.2%

UC 356×406×235 to BS EN 10365:2017; HE 340 M to EN 10365 · Continental Steel. Difference is expressed relative to HE 340 M.

How to choose between them

On stiffness, UC 356×406×235 has the larger second moment of area: 79,100 cm⁴ against 76,400 cm⁴, a difference of 3.5%. This matters more often than the strength comparison, because on normal floor spans deflection rather than bending capacity sets the beam size - so if the two are close on modulus but apart on inertia, the stiffer one is usually the better answer even when it is not the stronger one.

Measured as bending capacity per kilogram of steel, UC 356×406×235 is the more efficient section: 19.9 against 19.0 cm³ per kg/m, 4.8% better. Over a floor of repeated beams that difference is real tonnage, though it is often outweighed by whichever section the fabricator can actually source.

The two diverge much more about the minor axis: UC 356×406×235 has 2380 cm³ of minor-axis plastic modulus against 1950 cm³, 22.1% more. If the member sees any minor-axis bending, or if it is unrestrained over a long length and lateral-torsional buckling governs, that gap decides the comparison even though the major-axis numbers looked equivalent.

These come from different catalogues, so treat the swap as a design change rather than a like-for-like substitution. UC sections are specified to BS EN 10365:2017 and HE to EN 10365 · Continental Steel; the steel grades, tolerances and available lengths differ, connection details and bolt gauges are set out differently, and the two are rarely both stocked in the same market. Check availability before changing a section on a drawing to save 5.2% weight.

In short, HE 340 M is the stronger section and UC 356×406×235 is the lighter one; where those are the same section, it is the clear choice, and where they are not, decide on whether your design is governed by capacity or by tonnage.

Common questions

They are effectively equal in bending. UC 356×406×235 has a plastic modulus of 4690 cm³ and HE 340 M has 4720 cm³, a difference of only 0.6% - within the margin that section choice normally turns on. Compare stiffness and availability instead.

UC 356×406×235 at 235.1 kg/m, against 248 kg/m for the other - a saving of 5.2%. Over a repeated floor beam that is a real cost difference, but check it against the deflection case before taking it.

Structurally it is the closest equivalent we hold: HE 340 M gives 4720 cm³ of plastic modulus and 76,400 cm⁴ of inertia against 4690 cm³ and 79,100 cm⁴. But they are from different catalogues (BS EN 10365:2017 and EN 10365 · Continental Steel), so this is a design change, not a drop-in swap: re-check deflection, connection detailing and local availability.

UC 356×406×235, with a second moment of area of 79,100 cm⁴ against 76,400 cm⁴ (3.5% more). Deflection under a uniform load goes as 5wL⁴/384EI, so it is inversely proportional to I - on a span where the deflection limit governs rather than strength, this is the number that decides the section.

Related comparisons

UC 356×406×235 vs W 14X159W 14X159 vs HE 340 M
Rate this
No ratings yet
Sign in to join the discussion.
Loading…